About ifriction.com

ifriction.com

.
.
Braking News
.
Headlines
Archives
Press Releases Wanted
.
Industry Search
.
Supplier Search
Friction/Brake Search
Product Listing
Executive Search
.

Publications

.
Facts about Friction
.
Research
.
Technical Reports
Organizations
Standards
.
Events
.
Calendar

 

Get Connected to the Friction Material Industry

 

LINK TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.

13840 ELMIRA AVE. DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48227-3017

Phone (313) 933-4900   Fax (313) 933-0710

beep@linktestlab.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How To Read And Understand The Aftermarket Standard
SAE J2430/Brake Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure
Ó Test Report

Analysis and decision-making tool for the brake industry

 

 

 

 

 

B.E.E.P.Ó white paper 02-001

Link Testing Laboratories B.E.E.P. Ó task force

 

 

How to read and understand the
aftermarket standard
SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.
Ó test report

 

 

 

Formulators, process designers, plant managers, application engineers, quality control managers, purchasing agents and business unit managers can benefit from SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó testing

Introduction

Brake effectiveness evaluation has always been a demanding automotive engineering task. The introduction of the SAE-J2430 SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD in 1999 [1] and the adoption of it by the Brake Manufacturers Council as the basis for the Brake Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure for friction material used on passenger cars and light truck brake systems makes this task easier. It is a single-ended inertia dynamometer test reviewed and endorsed by the brake industry and supported by almost 1,000 dynamometer tests and 50 fully instrumented vehicle tests.

The SAE J2430/B.E.E.P. Test procedure resembles the main sections of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 105 [2] and 135 [3]. Not having a reference material on the other axle, it gives a high degree of repeatability and consistency from test to test.

Further introduction of the Brake Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure by the BMC friction materials committee, creates a reliable framework to assess actual performance of a friction material. The acceptance criteria are derived from the FMVSS requirements and studies performed by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

Driving forces for this industry effort are: stringent new brake performance requirements, increasing interest in the aftermarket customers in standardized test procedures open to the industry as a way to reduce testing costs and reduce development times, recent safety issues and the industry interest in self-verification and overall technological improvement.

 

The BMC/FMC recognizes and supports the use of the
SAE J2430 as a basis for meeting the BMC/FMC objective

"The BMC Friction Material Committee resolves that aftermarket brake friction materials should not deteriorate vehicle braking performance below the applicable federal motor vehicle safety standard, and recognizes that on-vehicle, dynamometer, or other equivalent testing, engineering or computer analyses may be employed by manufacturers of replacement friction in making good faith efforts to determine FMVSS performance."[4]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:

This is a document for technical reference only. Link Engineering Co., Link Testing Laboratories., Inc. or the BMC shall be held harmless for product liability including, but not necessarily limited to, product design, manufacture, performance and acceptability for use.

 

SAE J2430 tests friction materials one at a time, following the market practice of changing brake linings one axle at a time.

Why a SAE standard for dynamometer testing

“SAE J2430 is an improvement over SAE J661/J866 as a friction material effectiveness characterization test of replacement brake linings. SAE J661 uses a one-inch square sample running against a large drum and is known to have shortcomings for characterizing the vehicle performance of different types of automotive brake linings.” [1]

A single-ended inertia dynamometer test has among others, the following advantages over other types of tests [5]:

·         Uses vehicle specific hardware and test conditions derived from detailed vehicle tests.

·         Tests only one material at a time without the influence of a reference material on the other axle that affects repeatability and accurate assessment of the material tested.

·         Specifies, in detail, control inputs and permits in-depth assessment on how the test was performed. Brake cooling, which is critical in performance tests, is also properly defined.

·         Cost-effective when compared to a full vehicle test.

·         Developed in more than 7 years of continuous testing and close analysis of results by Original Equipment Manufacturers, suppliers, consultants and friction manufacturers.

·         Takes advantage of the expertise available through the SAE committees structure and approach to develop and validate testing protocols with detailed peer reviews in an open discussion forum. Periodical updates keep standards current with the application and testing industry.

·         Can be run on single-ended dynamometers. Single-ended dynamometers far exceed the amount of dual-ended dynamometers available throughout the industry.

 

Performance limits are based on stopping distance and maximum pedal force defined on the federal requirements.

Why the Brake Manufacturers Council performance limits?

As a second phase of the SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó program, the friction materials committee developed a set of criteria consistent with the FMVSS vehicle test requirements [5]. SAE J2430 does not include acceptance or performance limits, so its applicability for effectiveness characterization required a mathematical modeling of the vehicle dynamics and its corresponding relationship with the federal stopping distance and pedal force requirements. The BMC also developed a test report format in order to present test data in a consistent and repeatable way. Performance criteria include [4]:

·         Average of ramp applications should be within the FMVSS effectiveness space requirements. Regressed specific torque within the limits allowed for stopping distance requirements, maximum pedal force and brake balance. Over-effective performance is also compared to maximum limits on pedal force and deceleration limits.

·         Cold Effectiveness and fade snubs within acceptable limits of deceleration and maximum pedal force.

·         Hot Effectiveness stops above the minimum deceleration requirements within pedal force limits.

·         Post-test structural integrity to assure friction material is able to go through the test without mechanical failure or detachment from the backing plate.

 

Brake balance between front and rear axles is the basic criteria for the inertia split calculation

 

 

 

The BMC has external consultants to audit how a valid test is run

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control program parameters, performance limits and acceptance criteria are defined based on the federal requirements, not the original equipment friction material or any reference material

How a vehicle is made available for SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó testing

SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó testing requires specific test conditions and hardware information before the actual test can be performed. Vehicles to be tested should meet some initial criteria:

·         Current production on-road vehicle

·         Up to 3,500 kg gross vehicle weight

·         Be available for the corresponding floor-checks and measurements

Vehicles can be added based on BMC platform development committee request to any approved testing facility or direct customer requirement as part of their engineering or marketing validation programs. Link Testing Laboratories., Inc. also develops vehicles independently to make them available to the industry for regular testing.

Information is used to: gather hardware information to build fixtures for front and rear axle friction materials testing, define the required inertia for regular testing based on brake balance, determine the vehicle specific parameters for the control program and performance limits for the acceptance criteria shown on the report. Procedures for obtaining the vehicle information follow Federal Test Codes requirements. [5]. Vehicle data can be grouped as follows:

·         Physical dimensions and weights: wheelbase, tire rolling radius, brake effective radius, brake disc or drum dimensions, center of gravity height, gross and lightly loaded vehicle weight.

·         Hydraulic system pressure levels with and without power assist, pressure profiles for 135 N/s pedal force ramp rate, knee point when proportioning valve available, booster runout pressure, pressure levels at 667 N and 500 N pedal force for FMVSS 105 and 135 respectively certified vehicles and 1,000 N maximum pedal force corresponding pressure for the effectiveness section per FMVSS pedal force limit.

·         Brake hardware part numbers and FMSI identification for friction materials, both front and rear.

Link Testing Laboratories, Inc. performs internal testing using the original equipment friction material to fine-tune the computer control program for the dynamometer and have an exemplar data set to develop the test report format. Control program parameters, performance limits and acceptance criteria are defined based on the federal requirements, not the original equipment friction material or any other friction product.

Other options to develop a vehicle for regular SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó testing is via a testing program agreement with Link Testing Laboratories., Inc.

Customers with floor check capabilities and the proper inertia dynamometer with the technical capabilities specified in the current SAE J2430 SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD can develop vehicles for testing on their own.

Link Testing Laboratories B.E.E.P.Ó task force can assist with training, control program development and screening programs ranging from basic awareness sessions to full in-house testing capabilities.

 

 

 

 

SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó test can be used to characterize effectiveness on friction materials -brake pad or brake lining- or components –rotors, drums, calipers-

 

What is needed to perform a SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó test

Running a regular SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó on any of the available vehicles only requires sending parts, indicating the amount of tests to be performed and arranging the test schedule by phone or e-mail. Unlike other test procedures where test conditions may vary from customer to customer, SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó test conditions are pre-defined for each vehicle.

Parts required to run a test are:

·         Friction material for effectiveness characterization. Rotor or drum and hardware used are original equipment level.

·         Rotor or drum for effectiveness characterization. Friction material and hardware used are original equipment level.

Test report is submitted in Adobe Acrobat format along with a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

Typical turnaround for a SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó test is one to two weeks.

 

 

 

Brake inertia dynamometers

Inertia dynamometers are brake-testing equipment used to perform a variety of testing ranging from quick friction coefficient analysis for coated rotors to FMVSS 105 or 135 simulations. Performance, durability, capacity and noise tests are the most common tests performed.

Single-ended dynamometers utilize brake components from one corner of the vehicle in order to subject the components to a series of brake applications defined in the test procedure. The vast majority of inertia dynamometers procedures (SAE, JASO, ISO, AK, FMVSS, JIS or proprietary) used by original equipment suppliers, friction vendors and component manufacturers are designed for single-ended dynamometers.

Main components of an inertia dynamometer are: main drive, inertia section, brake enclosure, cooling air system, computer control console and fixture with brake components for testing. The main drive accelerates the mass inertia that simulates the vehicle’s kinetic energy and then the brake is applied to stop or reduce the speed of the mass. The motor can be also used to drag the brakes to simulate a constant downhill descent. If the brake is applied without rotation, parking brake forces can be measured.

Typical sensors and signal conditioning include channels for reading speed, torque, pressure, fluid displacement and temperature. Noise testing requires a noise enclosure and microphones for brake noise data collection.

Modern Inertia dynamometers are controlled with Microsoft Widows based software and can simulate certain levels of inertia. Pressure profiles and complex control algorithms are also available.

Typical brake applications can be controlled by pressure, torque, deceleration or drag by pressure.

The start of the brake application can be by initial temperature or cycle time.

The release of the brake application can be by speed, torque, temperature or elapsed time.

 

 

           


 

 

 

Table 1. SAE J2430 Test procedure outline

Section

# Of Stops

Initial-Release Speed (km/h)

Control

IBT (oC)

Cycle Time (s)

 

0002:  Instrument Check
50 km/h Torque Control

5

50-3

Torque @ 0.31g

<100

 

 

0003:  Instrument Check
100 km/h Torque Control

5

100-3

Torque @ 0.31g

100

 

 

0004:  Instrument Check
Pressure Control

3

50-3

Pressure @ 75 N Pedal Force

100

 

 

0005:  Instrument Check
50 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

 

100

 

 

0006:  Instrument Check
100 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

None   Instrument Check
80 km/h Cooling Curve

18

80-80

Within Cooling Band

 

200 for Front

150 for Rear

15

 

0007:  Burnish

200

80-3

Torque @ 0.31g

100 oC or 97s

 

0008:  Effect. #1. Post Burnish
50 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

0009:  Effect. #1. Post Burnish
100 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

0010:  Post Burnish
Cold Effectiveness

6

100-3

Torque @ 0.65 g

100

 

 

0011:  Fade Heating Cycles

15

120-56

Torque @ 0.31g

55 1st Snub

45

 

0012:  Hot Performance
Effectiveness

2

100-3

1st at minimum pressure from Section 0010.

2nd at pressure corresponding to 500N Pedal Force for 135 Test / 667N for 105 Test

---

1st at 35

2nd at 30

 

0014:  Cooling Cycles

4

50-3

Torque @ 0.31g

---

120

 

0015:  Recovery
100 km/h Ramp

2

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

---

60

 

0016:  Reburnish

35

80-3

Torque @ 0.31g

100 oC 1st Stop, 100 oC or 97s

 

0017:  Final Effectiveness
50 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

0018:  Final Effectiveness
100 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

0019:  Final Effectiveness
160 km/h Ramp

5

50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h

135N/s Pedal Apply Rate

100

 

 

None   Post Test Cooling Curve
80 km/h

18

80 km/h constant

Within Cooling Band

 

200 for Front

150 for Rear

15

 

None   Post Test Cooling Curve
112 km/h

18

112 km/h constant

Within Cooling Band

 

200 for Front

150 for Rear

15